Former umpire Cyril Mitchley of South Africa feels players should be kept out of the DRS saga.

Remembered as the first cricketing official to refer a decision to the third umpire on television, Cyril Mitchley has spoken about the ugly fray of the DRS – Dressing Room drama, that unfolded in Bengaluru between both captains, Virat Kohli and Steven Smith couple of days back.

The South African based umpire said the players should be kept of the DRS system, which is meant to involve both the on and off field officials to take a legit call on a decision taken from either side.

The 78-year-old retired umpire, who referred the third eye to give a conclusive decision of Sachin Tendulkar’s run-out way back in 1992, did not comment on the ongoing row between both sides, but remained stern on the removal of player factor from the DRS saga.

Talking to Mid-Day from Johannesburg, Mitchley said the umpires should hold the right to refer upstairs and not any batsman or bowler.

“Give umpires the right to refer cases upstairs. They should be able to say, ‘I have a doubt and I would like to check this.’ It has to be the umpire who should reach out for technological help — not the bowler, not the batsman — only the umpire.”

The legendary umpire, however, kept this thoughts straight saying he is still an old school and is completely against the DRS. In his words, the addition of technology to bring more efficiency has deteriorated the value of an umpire and that it isn’t accurate too.

“All this technology takes away a thing called umpiring. I was against DRS right from the start. I supported India’s reluctance to embrace this particular technology because it was not perfect. DRS is still getting it wrong and we are in big trouble.”

During the second Test between India-Australia at Bengaluru, few decisions made the onlookers scratch their heads and one of them was that of David Warner. Courtesy the umpire’s call, the ball, which did not pitch on the line of stumps, went onto to miss the impact, and also just clipped the off stump, was given out, though not from the naked eye.

Mitchley feels if an umpire commits such an error, he should get negative markings for that.

“I watched Warner’s dismissal on television and that was diabolical; that was a shocker. For every bad call, the match referee can make a negative mark against the particular umpire and that according to me is the way to go.”

  • SHARE

    Related Posts

    India Vs New Zealand, Sourav Ganguly, Virat Kohli, Kane Williamson, Mitchell Santner, Ish Sodhi, Spinner, Men in Blue, Favourites, Limited-Overs Series,

    India v New Zealand, 1st ODI Match Prediction: Kiwis Prepared to Pose A Fresh...

    It was pretty much the same time on the calendar when the New Zealanders came visiting India last year for a limited overs showdown. After...

    Key Players to be Rested Ahead of Overseas Tours in South Africa and England:...

    Team India skipper Virat Kohli stated that the team management would give the much-needed rest to some of the key batsmen in the Indian...
    Ashes 2017-18, Steven Smith, Responds, Usman Khawaja, Suggestion, Cricket Australia, Asia, Selection Policy

    Steven Smith feels Usman Khawaja has been Offered Plenty in Asian Conditions

    Australia skipper Steven Smith has brushed aside the latest comments from top-order batsman Usman Khawaja, as latter believed he had been given limited chances...

    Imam-ul-Haq Hopeful of Following the Big Foot Steps of Uncle Inzamam

    Imam-ul-Haq, the newest sensation of Pakistan cricket has a long way to go, but at least he has started off his journey in a...

    Watch: Arjun Tendulkar Troubles Shikhar Dhawan with a Well Directed Bouncer

    Team India is all set to continue their winning streak once they take on New Zealand in the three-match ODI series starting tomorrow at...